Comrade Starmer
Is Starmer intentionally undermining the national interest?
Ever since coming into office, our new Prime Minister has been working diligently at undermining the national interest. Cracking down on free speech, breaking almost every single manifesto promise, releasing violent prisoners early, fellating trade unions, and now proposing higher taxes…
The government’s upcoming budget in October is forecast to be dreary. The Labour Party never exuded confidence and inspiration; our Supreme Leader has promised us that “it will be painful” and that he “has no other choice.”
“The £20bn black hole”
One of Starmer’s most consistent tropes since “discovering the state of the nation’s finances” has to been to blame his predecessors for the dire state of the country. There is some truth to this — his predecessors were also useless — but the £20bn target of his attention seems intentionally misdirected.
It may well have been true that he expected there to be another £20bn in the nation’s coffers (although it was his responsibility to know), but this focus is insincere; the current state of the nation’s finances are far worse than Starmer admits. Britain currently runs a deficit of £87.2bn/year, on top of a national debt that stands at £2.74 trillion. According to the OBR, interest payments on the debt alone will reach £73.5bn in 2025, and unfunded liabilities are estimated to be anywhere between £4 trillion and £6 trillion.
There are only two conclusions that could possibly be drawn from this:
The Prime Minister does not have any grasp over the numbers whatsoever (I’ll admit, this is possible)
He understands the numbers, but is intentionally misdirecting the public’s ire because he has no solutions or ideas (far more likely)
Comrade Starmer has some form when it comes to dealing with his opponents. Protests against your policies? Throw everyone in prison. Not enough space in prison? Release violent offenders early to make room. Not a popular policy? Send prisoners to Estonia instead. Breaking all manifesto promises? Ban smoking in pub gardens — that’ll teach the proles not to oppose the правда.
How radical is Comrade Starmer?
After having been recently voted the most unpopular Prime Minister in the history of the UK, one might be curious as to Comrade Starmer’s roots. Peter Hitchens has warned numerous times that our new leader is far more radical than he’s been given credit for, and that his centrist image has been intentionally concocted to mislead the electorate. Hitchens cites Starmer’s involvement with Trotskyist groups like the International Revolutionary Marxist Tendency (IRMT), as well as the fact that he used to be the editor for the Marxist magazine Socialist Alternatives.
Aged 23, at the height of The Cold War, Starmer was one of 17 volunteers who went behind The Iron Curtain to a Communist workers’ camp in Czechoslovakia, where he was monitored by their Secret Police.
The Daily Mail uncovered this information and published it in June, but for some reason it hardly garnered any attention. Its worth sharing what was discovered:
“Files marked 'Top Secret' from a previous International Work Camp in Prague in 1982 show it was overseen by the ruthless Czech StB spy agency as part of a wide-ranging and far-reaching 'Active Measure' – a euphemism for black operations and disinformation campaign – to undermine Nato.
The secret police also planted a spy posing as a camp 'supervisor' among the foreign students in 1982 to produce a classified dossier profiling the visitors which earmarked some for 'further exploration' who could potentially be of 'use in the future'.
The files from Sir Keir's camp do not specify whether the secret police planned to use the information they harvested from him and others, but security experts said they also appeared to be gathering intelligence about young high-fliers in Western countries for potential long-term use.”
Hypothetically, if we did have a Prime Minister who had been given the explicit marching orders to undermine the national interest, would it look any different from what we have today?